Apparatus, systems and methods for row unit downforce control

ABSTRACT

Systems, methods and apparatus for controlling the downforce applied to a row unit of an agricultural implement having multiple row units. A downpressure control device in fluid communication with a down chamber of the least one actuator maintains as a selected downpressure, any one of a continuous range of pressures in the downpressure chamber. A lift pressure control device in fluid communication with a lift chamber of the at least one actuator for controlling pressure in the lift chamber maintains as a selected lift pressure, any one of a continuous range of pressures in the lift chamber.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.15/047,221, filed Feb. 18, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S.application Ser. No. 14/237,231, filed Feb. 5, 2014, which is theNational Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2012/049747, filedAug. 6, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional ApplicationNo. 61/515,700, filed Aug. 5, 2011.

BACKGROUND

It is recognized that sufficient downforce must be exerted on a planterrow unit to ensure the desired furrow depth and soil compaction isachieved. If excessive downforce is applied, especially in soft or moistsoils, the soil may be overly compacted which can affect the ability ofgerminating seeds to break through the soil. If insufficient downforceis applied, particularly in hard or dry soil, the planter may ride upand out of the soil resulting in insufficient depth of the furrow.

In the past, coiled springs extending between the parallel arms of therow units of the planter were often employed to provide the additionalor “supplemental” downforce needed to ensure the desired furrow depthand soil compaction was achieved. By positioning the spring at variouspreset locations along the parallel arms, the amount of downforceexerted on the row unit could be increased or decreased. However, theamount of supplemental downforce exerted by the spring remained constantuntil the spring was repositioned. For example, when the planterencountered hard or dry soil such that greater supplemental downforce isnecessary to maintain furrow depth or the desired soil compaction, theoperator had to stop and adjust the location of the spring in order toincrease the supplemental downforce. Furthermore, during operation, asthe seed or fertilizer in the hoppers was dispensed, the weight of therow unit gradually decreased causing a corresponding reduction in thetotal downforce on the gauge wheels, because the supplemental downforceexerted by the spring remained substantially constant until the springwas manually repositioned.

More advanced supplemental downforce systems, such as disclosed in U.S.application Ser. No. 12/679,710 (Pub. No. US2010/0198529) by Sauder etal. (hereinafter “the Sauder '710 application”), which is incorporatedherein in its entirety by reference, measure the strain in a member ofthe gauge wheel adjusting mechanism to determine the force being exertedagainst the gauge wheels to determine the downforce. However, centralcontrol systems that apply a common supplemental downforce to each rowunit often fail to respond to unique loads experienced by each row unit,such that insufficient or excessive supplemental downforce may beapplied to any given row unit.

Thus, there is a need for a downforce control system that effectivelymaintains a desired downforce at each row unit of an agriculturalimplement having a plurality of row units.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a side elevation view of an embodiment of a planter row unit.

FIG. 1B is a side elevation view of the planter row unit of FIG. 1 witha depth regulating member being shown.

FIG. 2 is a top plan view of a tractor and the planter row unit of FIG.1 schematically illustrating one embodiment of a downforce controlsystem.

FIG. 3A is a more detailed schematic illustration of the downforcecontrol system of FIG. 2.

FIG. 3B is a schematic illustration of another embodiment of a downforcecontrol system.

FIG. 3C is a schematic illustration of yet another embodiment of adownforce control system incorporating a two-stage actuator.

FIG. 3D is a schematic illustration of yet another embodiment of adownforce control system incorporating a two-stage actuator and aregeneration circuit.

FIG. 4A illustrates an embodiment of a process flow for determining adown pressure.

FIG. 4B illustrates an embodiment of a process flow for determining alift pressure.

FIG. 4C illustrates another embodiment of a process flow for determininga lift pressure.

FIG. 4D illustrates pressure ranges for an actuator chamber.

FIG. 5A is a perspective view of an embodiment of a two-stage actuator.

FIG. 5B is a cross-sectional view of the two-stage actuator of FIG. 5A.

FIG. 5C is a cross-sectional view of the two-stage actuator of FIG. 5A.

FIG. 6A illustrates another embodiment of a process flow for determininga down pressure.

FIG. 6B illustrates another embodiment of a process flow for determininga lift pressure.

FIG. 7 illustrates yet another embodiment of a process flow fordetermining a lift pressure.

FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of an actuatorincorporating a pressure transducer.

DESCRIPTION Row Unit Downforce System

Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designateidentical or corresponding parts throughout the several views, FIG. 1Aillustrates a side elevation view of a row unit 10 of a planter 1. A topplan view of the planter 1 is shown in FIG. 2 with four row units 10mounted in laterally spaced relation along the length of a toolbar 2 byparallel arm linkages 8 which permit each row unit to move verticallyindependently of one another and with respect to the toolbar 2. Itshould be understood that the planter 1 may comprise many more row unitsand thus the four-row planter of FIG. 2 is provided for illustrationpurposes only.

Each row unit 10 includes a row unit frame supporting one or more binsor hoppers 20 for holding seeds, insecticide or other crop inputs. Eachrow unit 10 includes opening discs 12 for opening a furrow or trench inthe soil 14 as the planter is pulled through the field by a tractor 50.The depth of the trench is set by gauge wheels 18 which ride on thesurface of the soil 14.

Turning to the view of FIG. 1B, the gauge wheels 18 are mounted to gaugewheel arms 36 at axles 34. Gauge wheel arms 36 are pivotally mounted tothe frame 6 at a pivot point 56. A depth adjustment arm 54 is pivotallymounted to the frame 6 about a pin 51. The depth adjustment arm 54contacts the gauge wheel arm 36, limiting the upward travel of the gaugewheels 18. The operator may rotate the depth adjustment arm 54 to adjustthe position of the depth adjustment arm 54 and thus the maximum heightof the gauge wheels 18 relative to the frame 6. It should be appreciatedthat other embodiments of the row unit 10 are known in the art, such asthose including gauge wheels that “walk” over obstacles by means of arocker as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,235,922, incorporated hereinin its entirety by reference.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1B, each row unit 10 preferably incorporatesa downforce sensor 52 for measuring a parameter related to the verticalforce between the gauge wheels 18 and the surface of the soil 14 andgenerating a load signal related to such parameter. The sensor 52 maycomprise any sensor configured to measure such parameter, including astrain gauge mounted to the gauge wheel arm 36 as illustrated in FIG. 1Band as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,701,857 to Jensen, incorporatedherein in its entirety by reference. In other embodiments, the sensor 52may comprise a load-sensing pin replacing the pin 51 as disclosed inU.S. patent publication no. US 2010/0180695, incorporated herein in itsentirety by reference. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the signals from eachof the sensors, 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, 52-4 are transmitted via a signal wire38, which together comprise a signal harness 31, to the monitor 42 (FIG.2) preferably located in the cab of the tractor 50. A preferred monitor42 is disclosed in U.S. patent publication no. US 2010/0010667,incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. The monitor 42preferably includes a processor, memory, and a graphical user interface(“GUI”).

It should be appreciated that the force on the gauge wheels 18represents the downforce on the row unit 10 in excess of the downforcerequired by the opening discs 12 to penetrate the soil 14 to a desireddepth. Thus in operation, it is desirable to maintain a certain minimumthreshold of force on gauge wheels 18 to ensure that the row unit isoperating at the desired depth. However, it is desirable to keep theforce on gauge wheels 18 below an upper threshold in order to minimizecompaction and avoid pushing soil 14 in the direction of travel.

In order to assist in maintaining optimal levels of downforce, the rowunit 10 is provided with an actuator 32. The actuator 32 is pivotallymounted at a first end to the toolbar 2 by a mounting bracket. Theactuator 32 is pivotally mounted at a second end to one of the arms ofthe parallel linkage 8. A first fluid line 40 is in fluid communicationwith a lift chamber 35 (FIG. 3A) of the actuator 32. A second fluid line44 is in fluid communication with a down chamber 33 (FIG. 3A) of theactuator 32. When the pressure in the down chamber 33 exceeds thepressure in the lift chamber 35, the actuator 32 exerts a downward forceon the row unit 10, increasing the force on the gauge wheels 18. Whenthe pressure in the lift chamber 35 exceeds the pressure in the downchamber 33, the actuator 32 exerts an upward force on the row unit 10,reducing the force on the gauge wheels 18.

A control system 300 is used to control the actuators 32. A fluid supplyline 43 connects the control system 300 to a fluid supply port 376 (FIG.3A) of a fluid reservoir (not shown) preferably mounted on the tractor50. A fluid return line 48 connects the control system 300 to a fluidreturn port 374 (FIG. 3A) of the fluid reservoir. An actuator harness 45connects the monitor 42 to the control system 300 for sending actuatorcommand signals to each actuator 32 on each row unit 10.

Pressure Control System

One embodiment of control system 300 is illustrated schematically inFIG. 3A. The control system 300 includes a lift pressure control device310 in fluid communication with the fluid supply line 43 and the fluidreturn line 48. The lift pressure control device 310 is in fluidcommunication with the lift chamber 35 of each actuator 32-1, 32-2,32-3, 32-4. The control system 300 also includes down pressure controldevices 320. Each down pressure control device 320-1, 320-2, 320-3,320-4 is in fluid communication with the fluid supply line 43 and thefluid return line 48. Each down pressure control device 320-1 is influid communication with the down chamber 33 of a respective one of theactuators 32-1, 32-2, 32-3, 32-4. Monitor 42 is preferably in electricalcommunication with the each of the down pressure control devices 320 andwith the lift pressure control device 310 via the actuator harness 45.The monitor 42 is preferably configured to modify an operating state ofeach control device 310, 320 (e.g., to change the pressure commanded byeach control device).

In operation, the monitor 42 commands an individual down pressure toeach down pressure control device 320 which then sets the commanded downpressure in the down chamber 33 of the associated actuator 32. Themonitor 42 also commands a common lift pressure to the lift pressurecontrol device 310 which then sets the commanded common lift pressure inthe lift chambers 35 of each actuator 32.

In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3B, the lift pressure controldevice 310 and the down pressure control devices 320 comprise pressurereducing-relieving valves such as Model No. TS10-36 manufactured byHydraForce in Lincolnshire, Ill. In such an embodiment, the fluid supplyline 43 and the fluid return line 48 are in fluid communication with thepressure and tank ports, respectively, of each valve, and the work portof each valve is connected to the associated actuator 32. The monitor 42is in electrical communication with a solenoid associated with eachvalve. In operation, the monitor 42 sends an individual control currentto each valve and each valve sets a pressure proportional to theassociated control current.

Control Processes

Because the lift pressure in the control system 300 is common to allrows, a process of controlling such a system preferably sets anappropriate lift pressure based on the down pressure being applied atevery row. Such a process preferably minimizes the occurrence of lostplanting depth at any row and preferably minimizes the occurrence ofexcess downforce at any row.

A preferred process 400 of determining and setting the desired downpressure and lift pressure in actuators 32 is illustrated in FIGS.4A-4B. The process 400 includes processes 420 for determining andcommanding the desired down pressure for each row unit 10 and a process450 for determining and commanding the desired common lift pressure forall row units.

Referring to FIG. 4A, a separate process 420 is used for each row inorder to determine the individual down pressure to command to eachactuator 32. At step 402, the monitor 42 obtains the current downforcemeasurement for the row from the associated sensor 52. At step 404, themonitor 42 preferably determines a desired net pressure preferably basedon the current downforce measurement. The desired net pressure is thedesired sum of the down pressure in the down chamber 33 less the liftpressure in the lift chamber 35. In order to determine the down pressurerequired to obtain the desired net pressure, the monitor 42 preferablyobtains the currently commanded lift pressure at step 406. The currentlycommanded lift pressure is preferably stored in memory by process 450,as described herein with respect to FIG. 4B. At step 408, the monitor 42determines a commanded down pressure based on the currently commandedlift pressure and the desired net pressure. At step 410, the monitor 42sends a command signal to the down pressure control device 320 relatedto the commanded down pressure. At step 412, the monitor 42 preferablystores the new commanded down pressure in memory.

Turning to FIG. 4B, a process 450 preferably compares the current downpressure at every row to a desired range and then determines anappropriate common lift pressure to command to the actuators 32 based onthose comparisons. One embodiment of a desired down pressure range 480is illustrated in FIG. 4D. As illustrated, each down pressure chamberhas a maximum operating pressure 472. In the illustrated embodiment, themaximum operating pressure 472 is approximately 3000 psi. It should beappreciated in light of this disclosure that if the monitor 42 iscommanding a negative down pressure in one row, then the process 420 hasdetermined that that row needs more lift pressure than what is beingprovided by the lift chamber; i.e., the excess downforce is too high.Thus, the desired range 480 preferably has a minimum 484 approximatelyequal to zero. Contrarily, if the monitor 42 is commanding a downpressure greater than the maximum operating pressure of the downchamber, then the lift pressure needs to be reduced in order to maintaindepth at that row. Thus, the desired range 480 has a maximum 482approximately equal to the maximum operating pressure 472.

It should also be appreciated that because hydraulic systems take acertain amount of time to react to commands, it may be desirable tobegin to modify the lift pressure as the down pressure in a given rowapproaches either zero or the maximum operating pressure of the downchamber. Thus, a second embodiment of a desired down pressure range 490is illustrated in FIG. 4D. The desired range 490 has a maximum 492 whichis less than the maximum operating pressure 472 by an upper band 495.The desired range 490 has a minimum 494 which is greater than themaximum operating pressure 472 by a lower band 493. The magnitudes ofthe lower band 493 and the upper band 495 are chosen to allow thecontrol system 300 to proactively change the lift pressure withoutmaking unnecessary or too-frequent changes to the lift pressure.

Thus, returning to FIG. 4B and the process 450 for determining liftpressure, the monitor 42 obtains the currently commanded down pressurefor each row at step 432. The currently commanded down pressure ispreferably stored in memory by the process 420 as discussed herein withrespect to FIG. 4A. At step 434, the monitor 42 determines whether thedown pressure in any of the actuators 32 is outside of a desired range.If the down pressure is within the desired range for all actuators, thenat step 436 the monitor 42 preferably retains the currently commandedlift pressure and at step 446 preferably stores the currently commandedlift pressure in memory.

If the down pressure is outside the desired range for at least oneactuator, then at step 438 the monitor 42 determines whether one or morerows are above or below the desired range. If at least one row is abovethe desired range and no rows are below the desired range, then at step440 the monitor 42 preferably commands a decrease in lift pressure andat step 446 preferably stores the new commanded lift pressure in memory.If at least one row is below the desired range and no rows are above thedesired range, then at step 444 the monitor 42 preferably commands anincrease in lift pressure and at step 446 preferably stores the newcommanded lift pressure in memory. If at least one row is above thedesired range and at least one row is below the desired range, then atstep 442 the monitor 42 preferably commands a decrease in lift pressureand at step 446 preferably stores the new commanded lift pressure inmemory. Decreasing the lift pressure at step 442 is preferable becausewhere a first row has excess down pressure and a second row hasinsufficient down pressure, the potential economic cost to the first row(due to losing depth and potentially placing seeds on top of the soil)is generally greater than the potential economic cost to the second row(due to excess soil compaction or poor trench definition).

In an alternative embodiment of process 450, rather than retaining thecurrent lift pressure at step 436 when all rows are within the desiredrange, the system performs an alternative process 436′ illustrated inFIG. 4C. At step 462, the monitor 42 averages the down pressure in theactuators 32. At step 464, the monitor 42 compares the average downpressure value to a midrange operating pressure 473 (FIG. 4D) associatedwith the actuators 32. In some embodiments, the midrange operatingpressure 473 is one-half of the maximum operating pressure 472. If theaverage down pressure is below the midrange operating pressure 473, thenat step 468 the monitor 42 commands an increase in lift pressure.Increasing the lift pressure will tend to increase the average downpressure in the actuators 32. Likewise, if the average down pressure isabove the midrange operating pressure 473, then at step 466 the monitor42 commands a reduction in lift pressure. Decreasing the lift pressurewill tend to decrease the average down pressure in actuators 32. Itshould be appreciated in light of this disclosure that maintaining theaverage down pressure in actuators 32 at or near the midrange operatingpressure 473 of the actuators will allow the system to react moreeffectively to changes in desired net pressure. Thus if the average downpressure is substantially equal to the midrange operating pressure 473,then at step 470 the monitor 42 retains the current lift pressure.

In the process 420 described above with reference to FIG. 4A, the liftpressure is obtained directly in a “feed forward” manner and used (inaddition to the current downforce measurement) in determining a newcommanded lift pressure. However, the step at step 406 of obtaining thecurrent lift pressure could be eliminated in some embodiments of theprocess 420, resulting in a feedback system in which the effects ofchanges in lift pressure are taken into account after they affect thecurrent downforce measurement. In such embodiments, the step ofdetermining a desired net pressure at step 404 could also be eliminatedsuch that the monitor 42 simply determines a new down pressure (orchange in down pressure) based on the current downforce measurement.

Alternative Control Systems and Processes

In the system embodiments of FIGS. 3A and 3B, the down pressure iscontrolled individually while the lift pressure is controlled by asingle control device. However, in other embodiments the lift pressureis controlled individually while the down pressure in all rows iscontrolled by a single control device. However, if one side of theactuator 32 is to be controlled on a per-row basis, it is preferable tocontrol the down pressure chambers individually (as in FIGS. 3A and 3B)because maintaining depth by timely addition of downforce wherenecessary is more economically and agronomically important than timelyremoval of excess downforce.

In still other embodiments, both the lift and down pressures may becontrolled individually by two pressure reducing-relieving valvesassociated with each row. Such embodiments involve significantlyincreased system cost as an additional valve must be used for each rowon the planter. Likewise, the lift pressure may be controlled in commonfor any number of rows between two and the number of rows on the toolbar(e.g., the lift pressure may be controlled separately for each of threesections of the planter).

In other embodiments of the control system 300 illustrated in FIG. 3A,the lift control device 310 and the down pressure control devices 320comprise electro-hydraulic flow control servo valves. In suchembodiments, each flow control servo valve is preferably in electricalcommunication with the monitor 42. In still other embodiments, the liftcontrol device 310 and the down pressure control devices 320 eachcomprise both an electro-hydraulic flow control servo valve and apressure sensor in fluid communication with a pressure sensor. In suchembodiments, each flow control servo valve and each pressure sensors arepreferably in electrical communication with the monitor 42.

In the process 400 described above, the process 420 for controlling thedown pressure comprises a feedback loop in which the input is thecurrent downforce measurement from each row. However, it should beappreciated that in embodiments where the lift pressure in each actuatoris controlled on a per-row basis and the down pressure is controlled bya common control device, the lift pressure is preferably determined by afeedback loop similar to process 420 using the current downforcemeasurement from each row. In such embodiments, the down pressure ispreferably controlled by a process similar to process 450, butmonitoring the lift pressure commanded to each row in order to determineand command a common down pressure.

In embodiments in which both the lift and down pressures of eachactuator are controlled by individual control devices at each row, boththe down and lift pressures of each actuator are preferably controlledby a process similar to process 420.

As illustrated in the process 700 of FIG. 7, the lift pressure may becontrolled by comparing any criterion related to soil penetration by theopener discs at each row to a desired range. It should be appreciatedthat in the embodiment of FIGS. 4A and 4B, the soil penetrationcriterion is equal to (or derived from) the commanded down pressure ateach row. However, in other embodiments this criterion may be related to(or derived from) any of the following, without limitation: a netpressure command (as determined at step 404 of FIG. 4A), the readingfrom sensor 52 (indicating the vertical force on the gauge wheels 18 ateach row), or the actual down pressure in the down pressure chamber 33of each actuator 32 (measured, e.g., by a pressure transducer 800—suchas those available from Gems Sensors and Controls in Plainville,Conn.—incorporated in each actuator as illustrated in FIG. 8). Whichevercriterion is obtained at step 732, the criterion at each row ispreferably compared to a desired range at step 734. If the soilpenetration criterion is within range for all rows, then the currentlift pressure is retained at step 736. If the soil penetration criterionis out of range for any row, then at step 738 the monitor 42 determineswhether the soil penetration criterion is high or low for each row. Ifthe soil penetration criterion for at least one row is high (indicatingmore force is needed to penetrate the soil to the desired depth) and isnot low for any rows, then the lift pressure is decreased at step 740.If the soil penetration criterion for at least one row is low(indicating that more force is being applied than needed to penetratethe soil to the desired depth) and is not high for any rows, then thelift pressure is increased at step 744. If the soil penetrationcriterion for at least one row is low and is high for at least one otherrow, then the lift pressure is preferably decreased at step 742 because,as discussed herein, the economic cost of excess downpressure isgenerally less than that associated with lost depth. It should beappreciated that at step 742, the control system 300 chooses one of twoundesirable actions (e.g., chooses to reduce the lift pressure ratherthan increase the lift pressure) based on an estimated economic oragronomic cost of both undesirable actions. In other embodiments, therelative economic cost of losing depth at a given number of rows iscompared to the economic cost of excess downforce at another number ofrows, and lift pressure is modified based on that comparison. In eachcase, at step 746 the commanded lift pressure is preferably stored inmemory for use in determining the desired down pressure at each row (asillustrated in FIG. 4A).

While the process 700 determines appropriate lift pressure as describedabove, the desired down pressure at each row is preferably determinedand commanded as described herein with respect to FIG. 4A. Thus itshould be appreciated in light of this disclosure that where the soilpenetration criterion is the reading from sensor 52 (i.e., verticalforce on gauge wheels 18), a higher sensor reading will correspond toless penetration force required (and vice versa) such that the soilpenetration criterion derived from the sensor reading is preferablyinversely related to sensor reading and may be derived, e.g., byinverting the sensor reading.

It should be appreciated in light of this disclosure that although agiven soil penetration criterion may be related to soil conditions suchas soil hardness or moisture, such a criterion may change for constantsoil conditions. For example, where the weight of an individual row unit10 decreases due to discharge of crop inputs during planting operations,more supplemental force may be required to penetrate the soil with theopener discs 12. In addition, a soil penetration criterion may representeither a supplemental force required to penetrate the soil or an amountof applied force in excess of the force required to penetrate the soil;for example, in some embodiments the magnitude of a positive criterionmay be related to the amount of additional force required to penetratethe soil, while the magnitude of a negative criterion may be related tothe amount of applied force in excess of the force required to penetratethe soil. In some embodiments, the criterion may also be Boolean, e.g.,it may have one of two values depending whether the soil has beenpenetrated to full depth; such embodiments may use a contact switch(e.g., disposed between the gauge wheel arms 36 and the stop 60) todetermine whether any force is being exerted on the gauge wheels 18 bythe ground.

It should also be appreciated in light of this disclosure that inalternative methods, multiple soil penetration criteria may be consultedin determining an appropriate lift pressure.

In addition, the magnitude of incremental adjustments made to the liftpressure and down pressure as described herein may be determined by aPID, PI or similar controllers as are known in the art.

Two-Stage Cylinder Downforce System

An alternative embodiment of the control system 300 is illustrated inFIG. 3C. Two rows are illustrated. In the control system 300′ of FIG.3C, each actuator 32 is replaced with a two-stage actuator 500. Thetwo-stage actuator 500 includes a lift chamber 535, a primary downchamber 515 and a supplemental down chamber 525. The primary downchambers 515 of the two-stage actuators 500 are preferably in fluidcommunication with the fluid supply and fluid return ports 376,374 viaindividual down pressure control devices 320. The lift chambers 535 arepreferably in fluid communication with the fluid supply and fluid returnports 376,374 via a common lift pressure control device 310. Thesupplemental down chambers 525 are preferably in fluid communicationwith the fluid supply and fluid return ports 376,374 via a commonsupplemental down pressure control device 315.

The control devices 310, 315, 320 may comprise pressurereducing-relieving valves. The monitor 42 is in electrical communicationwith the control devices 310, 315, 320, preferably by an electricalconnection to a solenoid associated with each control device.

The two-stage actuator 500 is illustrated in detail in FIGS. 5A and 5B.The actuator 500 includes a head 560 and a rod 550. The head 560includes the primary down chamber 515 in fluid communication with aprimary down chamber port 510, the supplemental down chamber 525 influid communication with a supplemental down chamber port 520, and thelift chamber 535 in fluid communication with a lift chamber port 530.The rod 550 is mounted to an inner rod 540. The inner rod 540 isslidingly received within the head 560. Inner rod 540 includes an upperannular surface 544 defining an upper surface of lift chamber 535. Innerrod 540 includes a lower annular surface 542 defining a lower surface ofsupplemental down chamber 525. Inner rod 540 also includes a primarydown chamber surface 541 which extends into primary down chamber 525.Head 560 preferably includes a mounting hole 590 for attachment to thetoolbar 2. As illustrated with respect to actuator 32 in FIG. 1A, rod550 is preferably attached to the row unit 10 for transmission ofvertical forces from the toolbar 2 to the row unit 10.

In operation of the two-stage actuator 500, as pressure increases inlift chamber 535, the increased pressure on the upper annular surface544 creates an upward force on interior rod 540 and thus on rod 550. Aspressure increases in primary down chamber 515, the increase pressure onthe primary down chamber surface 541 creates a downward force oninterior rod 540 and thus on rod 550. As pressure increases insupplemental down chamber 525, the increased pressure on the lowerannular surface 542 creates a downward force on interior rod 540 andthus on rod 550.

Referring to FIG. 5C, the surfaces 541,542,544 have surface areas A541,A542, A544, respectively. Likewise, the variable pressures of fluid inchambers 515, 525, 535 are indicated by reference numerals P515, P525,P535, respectively. Thus, a net vertical force F on the rod 550 may beexpressed as follows:

F=P ₅₁₅ A ₅₄₁ +P ₅₂₅ A ₅₄₂ −P ₅₃₅ A ₅₄₄

It should be appreciated in light of this disclosure that the two-stageactuator 500 allows the control system to operate with less cumulativefluid flow. Smaller, more frequent adjustments in net vertical force Fmay be made by adjusting the primary down pressure, while largeradjustments in downforce may be made by adjusting the supplemental downpressure when necessary. As a diameter D540 of inner rod 540 increases(i.e., as area A541 increases and area A542 decreases), the maximumvariable per-row downforce increases and the amount of flow sharedbetween the cylinders 500 decreases.

Two-Stage Cylinder Control Methods

In operation of the control system 300′ of FIG. 3C, the primary downpressure control device 310 provides an individual primary down pressureto each actuator 500. When the desired total down pressure for any rowis greater than the pressure that can be provided by the individual headpressure, the supplemental down pressure control device 315 increasesthe common supplemental down pressure in supplemental down pressurechamber 525 for all rows. As with the control system of FIGS. 3A and 3B,when the desired total down pressure for any row is negative, the liftpressure control device 310 increases the common lift pressure in liftpressure chamber 535 for all rows.

A preferred process 600 of controlling the control system 300′ of FIG.3C is illustrated in FIGS. 6A and 6B.

Referring to FIG. 6A, processes 620 are used to command a primary downpressure for each row based on the downforce measurement at that row andpreferably based on the lift and supplemental down pressures fed forwardfrom the process 650 (FIG. 6B). At step 602, the monitor 42 obtains thecurrent downforce measurement for the row from the associated sensor 52.At step 604, the monitor 42 determines a desired net pressure preferablybased on the current downforce measurement. The net pressure is the sumof the down pressures in the primary and supplemental down chambers515,525 less the lift pressure in the lift chamber 535. In order todetermine the primary down pressure required to obtain the desired netpressure, the monitor 42 obtains the currently commanded lift pressureand supplemental down pressure at step 606. At step 608, the monitor 42determines a commanded primary down pressure based on the currentlycommanded primary down pressure and lift pressure and the desired netpressure. At step 610, the monitor 42 sends a command signal to thecontrol device 320 related to the commanded primary down pressure. Atstep 612, the monitor 42 preferably stores the new commanded primarydown pressure in memory. It should be appreciated that the processes 620are similar to the processes 420 described herein except that both thecommanded lift pressure and supplemental down pressure are consulted anda primary down pressure is commanded.

Turning to FIG. 6B, a process 650 for determining lift pressure andsupplemental down pressure is illustrated. At step 632, the monitor 42obtains the currently commanded primary down pressure for each row. Thecurrently commanded primary down pressure is preferably stored in memoryby the process 620 as discussed herein with respect to FIG. 6A. At step634, the monitor 42 determines whether the primary down pressure in anyof the actuators 500 is outside of a desired range. The desired rangemay be similar to any of the desired ranges described with respect toFIG. 4D, except that the desired range is associated with the primarydown pressure chamber 515. If the primary down pressure is within thedesired range for all actuators, then at step 636 the monitor 42preferably retains the currently commanded supplemental down pressureand lift pressure and at step 646 preferably stores the currentlycommanded supplemental down pressure and lift pressure in memory.

If the down pressure is outside the desired range for at least oneactuator, then at step 638 the monitor 42 determines whether one or morerows are above or below the desired range. If at least one row is belowthe desired range and no rows are above the desired range, then at step643 the monitor 42 preferably reduces the commanded supplemental downpressure. At step 644, the monitor 42 determines whether the commandedsupplemental down pressure is negative. If the commanded supplementaldown pressure is negative, then at step 645 the monitor 42 preferablyincreases the commanded lift pressure and at step 646 preferably storesthe currently commanded lift pressure and supplemental down pressure inmemory. If the commanded supplemental down pressure is not negative,then at step 646 the monitor 42 preferably stores the currentlycommanded lift pressure and supplemental down pressure in memory withoutadjusting the commanded supplemental down pressure.

If at least one row is above the desired range and no rows are below thedesired range, then at step 640 the monitor 42 preferably commands adecrease in lift pressure. At step 649, the monitor 42 preferablydetermines whether the resulting commanded lift pressure is negative. Ifthe currently commanded lift pressure is negative, then at step 652 themonitor 42 preferably commands an increase in supplemental down pressureand at step 646 preferably stores the currently commanded supplementaldown pressure and lift pressure in memory. If the currently commandedlift pressure is not negative, then at step 646 the monitor 42preferably stores the currently commanded supplemental down pressure andlift pressure in memory without modifying the supplemental downpressure.

If at least one row is above the desired range and at least one row isbelow the desired range, then at step 642 the monitor 42 preferablycommands a decrease in lift pressure. At step 649, the monitor 42preferably determines whether the resulting commanded lift pressure isnegative. If the currently commanded lift pressure is negative, then atstep 652 the monitor 42 preferably commands an increase in supplementaldown pressure and at step 646 preferably stores the currently commandedsupplemental down pressure and lift pressure in memory. If the currentlycommanded lift pressure is not negative, then at step 646 the monitor 42preferably stores the currently commanded supplemental down pressure andlift pressure in memory without modifying the supplemental downpressure.

It should be appreciated in light of this disclosure that the process650 preferably does not pressurize the lift pressure chambers andsupplemental down pressure chambers simultaneously. Process 650 reducesthe supplemental down pressure to zero before increasing the liftpressure. As the commanded lift pressure becomes more negative, the liftpressure determined at step 645 increases. Likewise, process 650 reducesthe lift pressure to zero before increasing the supplemental downpressure. As the commanded lift pressure becomes more negative, thesupplemental down force determined at step 652 increases.

Regenerative Control Systems

As discussed above, the control system 300′ of FIG. 3C provides either acommon lift pressure or a common supplemental down pressure to all rows.In some scenarios, the monitor 42 may determine that lift pressure isrequired when supplemental down pressure is currently being applied, andvice versa. In order to decrease the time and fluid flow required tostop applying supplemental down pressure and start applying liftpressure (or vice versa), the control system 300″ of FIG. 3D selectivelyallows regeneration (i.e., direct flow) between the supplemental downchambers 525 and the lift chambers 535.

In the control system 300″ of FIG. 3D, the supplemental down chambersare placed in fluid communication by a control device 317. The controldevice 317 is preferably a solenoid-operated bi-directional poppet andflow control valve, but in some embodiments comprises a fixed orifice. Acontrol device 311 is in fluid communication with the lift pressurecontrol device 310 and the lift chambers 535. A control device 316 is influid communication with the supplemental down pressure control device315 and the supplemental down chambers 525. The control devices 311, 316are preferably solenoid-operated bi-directional poppet valves such asModel No. SV08-28 available from Hydraforce in Lincolnshire, Ill. Thesolenoids of the control devices 311, 316, 317 are in electricalcommunication with the monitor 42.

In operation of the control system 300″ of FIG. 3D, the monitor 42modifies operating parameters of control devices 311,316,317 in order toallow flow between the supplemental down chambers 525 and the liftchambers 535. To allow fluid to flow from the supplemental down chamber525 to the lift chamber 535, the control device 311 is opened (orremains open), control device 316 is closed, and control device 317 isopened. To allow fluid to flow from the lift chamber 535 to thesupplemental down chamber 525, the control device 311 is closed, controldevice 316 is opened (or remains open), and control device 317 isopened. In order to prevent regenerative flow, the control device 317 isclosed and control devices 311,316 are opened (or remain open),effectively converting the control system 300″ of FIG. 3D to controlsystem 300 of FIG. 3C.

Although the systems, methods and apparatus disclosed herein areprimarily described as hydraulic, it should be appreciated that theinstant disclosure could be used to implement a similar pneumaticsystem. For example, in some embodiments the cylinders described hereinare replaced with pneumatic cylinders or air bags and the valvesdescribed herein are replaced with pneumatic valves having equivalentfunctionality. It should also be understood that the planter 1 with rowunits 10 could be any agricultural implement with laterally spaced unitsthat move vertically with respect to toolbar and where it is desired tohave variable downforce for the laterally spaced units.

The foregoing description is presented to enable one of ordinary skillin the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the contextof a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications tothe preferred embodiment of the apparatus, and the general principlesand features of the system and methods described herein will be readilyapparent to those of skill in the art. Thus, the present invention isnot to be limited to the embodiments of the apparatus, system andmethods described above and illustrated in the drawing figures, but isto be accorded the widest scope consistent with the spirit and scope ofthe appended claims.

1. An agricultural implement having multiple row units, each row unitcomprising at least one opening disc for opening a trench in soil and atleast one gauge wheel for setting a depth of the trench, and having asystem for applying downforce to the row units, the system comprising: afirst actuator disposed to apply force to a first row unit, said firstactuator including a first down chamber and a first lift chamber,pressure in said first down chamber tending to oppose pressure in saidfirst lift chamber; a second actuator disposed to apply force to asecond row unit, said second actuator including a second down chamberand a second lift chamber, pressure in said second down chamber tendingto oppose pressure in said second lift chamber; a first downpressurecontrol device in fluid communication with said first down chamber forcontrolling pressure in said first down chamber, said first downpressurecontrol device configured to maintain as a selected first downpressureany one of a continuous range of pressures in said first down chamber; asecond downpressure control device in fluid communication with saidsecond down chamber for controlling pressure in said second downchamber, said second downpressure control device configured to maintainas a selected second downpressure any one of a continuous range ofpressures in said second down chamber, wherein said selected seconddownpressure is different from said selected first downpressure; a liftpressure control device in fluid communication with both said first liftchamber and said second lift chamber for controlling pressure in saidfirst lift chamber and said second lift chamber, said lift pressurecontrol device configured to maintain as a selected lift pressure anyone of a continuous range of pressures in both said first lift chamberand said second lift chamber, wherein said selected lift pressure isdifferent from said selected first downpressure and said selected seconddownpressure; and processing circuitry in electrical communication withsaid first downpressure control device, said second downpressure controldevice, and said lift pressure control device, said processing circuitryconfigured to modify an operating state of said first downpressurecontrol device, said second downpressure control device, and said liftpressure control device.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein saidprocessing circuitry is further configured to: determine a first soilpenetration criterion associated with said first row unit; determine asecond soil penetration criterion associated with said second row unit;determine whether either said first soil penetration criterion or saidsecond soil penetration criterion exceeds a predetermined range; andreduce pressure in said first lift chamber and said second lift chamberwhen either said first soil penetration criterion or said second soilpenetration criterion exceeds said predetermined range.
 3. The system ofclaim 2, further including: a first downforce sensor associated withsaid first row unit, said first downforce sensor in electricalcommunication with said processing circuitry, said first downforcesensor configured to generate a first downforce signal related to aforce between the ground and said first row unit; and a second downforcesensor associated with said second row unit, said second downforcesensor in electrical communication with said processing circuitry, saidsecond downforce sensor configured to generate a second downforce signalrelated to a force between the ground and said second row unit, whereinsaid processing circuitry is further configured to determine a pressurein said first down chamber based on said first downforce signal and todetermine a pressure in said second down chamber based on said seconddownforce signal.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein: said first soilpenetration criterion comprises one of: (a) the pressure in said firstdown chamber, (b) the pressure in said first down chamber less thepressure in said first lift chamber, and (c) said first downforcesignal; and said second soil penetration criterion comprises one of: (a)the pressure in said second down chamber, (b) the pressure in saidsecond down chamber less the pressure in said second lift chamber, and(c) said second downforce signal.
 5. The system of claim 3, wherein saidprocessing circuitry is further configured to: determine whether eithersaid first soil penetration criterion or said second soil penetrationcriterion is less than a predetermined range; and increase pressure insaid first lift chamber and said second lift chamber when either saidfirst soil penetration criterion or said second soil penetrationcriterion is less than said predetermined range, and when neither saidfirst soil penetration criterion nor said second soil penetrationcriterion exceeds said predetermined range.
 6. The system of claim 5,wherein said first downforce sensor comprises a load-sensing pin.
 7. Thesystem of claim 5, wherein said processing circuitry is furtherconfigured to retain the pressure in said first down chamber and saidsecond down chamber when both said first soil penetration criterion andsaid second soil penetration criterion are within said predeterminedrange.
 8. The system of claim 2, wherein said processing circuitry isfurther configured to: determine whether either said first soilpenetration criterion or said second soil penetration criterion is lessthen a predetermined range; and increase pressure in said first liftchamber and said second lift chamber when either said first soilpenetration criterion or said second soil penetration criterion is lessthan said predetermined range, and when neither said first soilpenetration criterion nor said second soil penetration criterion exceedssaid predetermined range.
 9. The system of claim 1, further including: afirst downforce sensor associated with said first row unit, said firstdownforce sensor in electrical communication with said processingcircuitry, said first downforce sensor configured to generate a firstdownforce signal related to a force between the ground and said firstrow unit; and a second downforce sensor associated with said second rowunit, said second downforce sensor in electrical communication with saidprocessing circuitry, said second downforce sensor configured togenerate a second downforce signal related to a force between the groundand said second row unit.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein saidprocessing circuitry is further configured to: select and command apressure in said first down chamber based on said first downforcesignal; and select and command a pressure in said second down chamberbased on said second downforce signal.
 11. A method of controlling theforce applied to a first agricultural row unit by a first actuatorhaving a first chamber and a second chamber and of controlling the forceapplied to a second agricultural row unit by a second actuator having athird chamber and a fourth chamber, the first and second agriculturalrow units including at least one opening disc for opening a trench insoil and at least one gauge wheel for setting a depth of the trench, themethod comprising: maintaining a first selected pressure in the firstchamber by modifying an operating state of a first control device influid communication with the first chamber; maintaining a secondselected pressure in the third chamber by modifying an operating stateof a second control device in fluid communication with the thirdchamber; and maintaining a third selected pressure in the second chamberand the fourth chamber by modifying an operating state of a thirdcontrol device in fluid communication with the second chamber and thefourth chamber, wherein said third selected pressure is different fromsaid first selected pressure and said second selected pressure.
 12. Themethod of claim 11, further comprising: determining a first soilpenetration criterion associated with the first row unit; determining asecond soil penetration criterion associated with the second row unit;determining whether either said first soil penetration criterion or saidsecond soil penetration criterion exceeds a predetermined range; andreducing said third selected pressure when either said first soilpenetration criterion or said second soil penetration criterion exceedssaid predetermined range.
 13. The method of claim 12, furthercomprising: generating a first downforce signal related to a forcebetween the ground and the first row unit; generating a second downforcesignal related to a force between the ground and the second row unit;selecting and commanding a pressure in the first chamber based on saidfirst downforce signal; and selecting and commanding a pressure in thethird chamber based on said second downforce signal.
 14. The method ofclaim 13, wherein: said first soil penetration criterion comprises oneof: (a) the pressure in the first chamber, (b) the pressure in the firstchamber less the pressure in the second chamber, and (c) said firstdownforce signal; and said second soil penetration criterion comprisesone of (a) the pressure in the third chamber, (b) the pressure in thethird chamber less the pressure in the fourth chamber, and (c) saidsecond downforce signal.
 15. The method of claim 12, further comprising:determining whether either said first soil penetration criterion or saidsecond soil penetration criterion is less than a predetermined range;and increasing said third selected pressure when either said first soilpenetration criterion or said second soil penetration criterion is lessthan said predetermined range and when neither said first soilpenetration criterion nor said second soil penetration criterion exceedssaid predetermined range.
 16. The method of claim 15, furthercomprising: retaining said third selected pressure when both said firstsoil penetration criterion and said second soil penetration criterionare within said predetermined range.
 17. The method of claim 16, whereinsaid first chamber and said third chamber are down chambers of saidfirst and second actuators, respectively, and wherein said secondchamber and said fourth chamber are lift chambers of said first andsecond actuators, respectively.
 18. The method of claim 11, furthercomprising: generating a first downforce signal related to a forcebetween the ground and the first row unit; and generating a seconddownforce signal related to a force between the ground and the secondrow unit.
 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising: selecting andcommanding a pressure in the first chamber based on said first downforcesignal; and selecting and commanding a pressure in the third chamberbased on said second downforce signal.